View the Executi" /> AFRICOM at 5 Years: The Maturation of a New U.S. Combatant Command

Text Browser Navigation Bar: Main Site Navigation and Search | Current Page Navigation | Current Page Content

U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> AFRICOM at 5 Years: The Maturation of a New U.S. Combatant Command

Login to "My SSI" Contact About SSI Cart: 0 items

Strategic Studies Institute

United States Army War College

The Source for National Security

Research & Analysis

U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Details

AFRICOM at 5 Years: The Maturation of a New U.S. Combatant Command

Authored by David E. Brown.

AFRICOM at 5 Years: The Matura... Cover Image

Brief Synopsis

View the Executive Summary

The U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM), newest of the six U.S. Department of Defense geographic combatant commands (CCMDs), was created in 2007 amid great controversy in both Africa and the United States over its location and mission. Over the last 5 years, AFRICOM has matured greatly, overcoming much of the initial resistance from African stakeholders through careful public messaging, and by addressing most of the U.S. interagency concerns about the Command’s size and proper role within the U.S. national security/foreign policy community. This Letort Paper describes the geostrategic, operational, and intellectual changes that explain why AFRICOM was created, and debunks three myths about AFRICOM: that it was created to “exploit” Africa's oil and gas riches, “blocks” China’s rise in Africa, and that France “opposes” AFRICOM. The author concludes by raising five issues that are important to AFRICOM’s future: 1) allocated forces to carry out short-term training engagements in Africa; 2) preference to emerging democracies in the selection of the Command’s partner-nations; 3) the desirability of regional approaches in Africa, including helping the African Union and its Regional Economic Communities to establish standby brigades; 4) the location of the Command’s headquarters, which should remain in Stuttgart, Germany, for operational efficiency; and, 5) the need to carry out a top-down “right-sizing” exercise at AFRICOM during a time of severe budget constraints and a real risk for the United States of “strategic insolvency.”

You may also be interested in the following titles:

Survey: AFRICOM at 5 Years: The Maturation of a New U.S. Combatant Command

1. How would you rate the writing and overall quality? (5 best - 1 Worst)

2. Is the content relevant for influencing present and future debates?

Also by the Author/Editor:

Africa's Booming Oil and Natural Gas Exploration and Production: National Security Implications for the United States and China
The Challenge of Drug Trafficking to Democratic Governance and Human Security in West Africa
Hidden Dragon, Crouching Lion: How China's Advance in Africa is Underestimated and Africa's Potential Underappreciated

View other pubs in the following categories:

Middle East and North Africa
Military Strategy and Policy
Sub-Saharan Africa
National Security Strategy

  • Download it Now!

  • Hardcopies

    • Study is: Available
    • Add to Cart
    • View Cart
    • All hardcopies are free of charge, shipping inclusive.
    • For out of stock publications, refer to the new GPO on-demand site. For a small fee, recieve many prior publications. Click here to visit.
    • All materials on our website are available as a free download.

Subscribe using RSS Website Subscriptions