Text Browser Navigation Bar: Main Site Navigation and Search | Current Page Navigation | Current Page Content

U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Ready For What and Modernized Against Whom?: A Strategic Perspective on Readiness and Modernization

Login to "My SSI" Contact About SSI Cart: 0 items

Strategic Studies Institute

United States Army War College

The Source for National Security

Research & Analysis

U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Details

Ready For What and Modernized Against Whom?: A Strategic Perspective on Readiness and Modernization

Authored by Dr. Jeffrey Record.

Ready For What and Modernized ... Cover Image

Other Studies by Keyword

+[Annual Strategy Conference] +[Readiness] +[modernization] +[bottom-up review] +[post-cold war] +[inter-state warfare] +[intra-state warfare] +[civil wars] +[Vietnam] +[f-22] +[v-22] +[Record] +[Transformation]

Brief Synopsis

Every April the Army War College's Strategic Studies Institute hosts its Annual Strategy Conference. This year's theme, "Strategy During the Lean Years: Learning from the Past and the Present," brings together scholars, serving and retired military officers, and civilian defense officials from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and France to discuss strategy formulation in times of penury from Tacitus to Force XXI. Dr. Jeffrey Record, a renowned military historian and former staff member of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee, states that while maintaining a capacity to engage in large-scale interstate conventional combat is indispensable, historically the unconventional and subnational conflicts have presented U.S. forces with their greatest challenges. He argues that the United States is entering an era in which small and unconventional wars will be the dominant form of conflict. Additionally, there will be pressure to participate in operations other than war, especially peacekeeping, humanitarian relief, and nation-building efforts. Modernization, Dr. Record argues, should be approached cautiously. Since the pace of technological change is so rapid, the United States must be much more discriminating in deciding what technologies to pursue from conceptualization through development and prototyping to production and deployment. While we can build a great many different technologically advanced weapons, the challenge is to decide which ones are necessary. The Army believes institutions are better prepared for change if there is a vigorous and informed debate about the direction and dynamics of that change.

You may also be interested in the following titles:

Survey: Ready For What and Modernized Against Whom?: A Strategic Perspective on Readiness and Modernization

1. How would you rate the writing and overall quality? (5 best - 1 Worst)

2. Is the content relevant for influencing present and future debates?

Also by the Author/Editor:

Japan's Decision for War in 1941: Some Enduring Lessons
Appeasement Reconsidered: Investigating the Mythology of the 1930s
Iraq and Vietnam: Differences, Similarities, and Insights
Bounding the Global War on Terrorism
The Creeping Irrelevance of U.S. Force Planning

View other pubs in the following category:

Military Change and Transformation

  • Download it Now!

    • Download Format: PDF
    • PDF File Size: 0.04MB
  • Hardcopies

    • Study is: Available via Download Only
    • View Cart
    • All hardcopies are free of charge, shipping inclusive.
    • For out of stock publications, refer to the new GPO on-demand site. For a small fee, recieve many prior publications. Click here to visit.
    • All materials on our website are available as a free download.

Subscribe using RSS Website Subscriptions